Bringing a Commercial Contract to an End in the UK

Introduction

A contract is usually discharged when both parties have performed all of their obligations under the agreement and thus both parties have fulfilled what they promised to do at the very outset of the contract. There is a distinction to be drawn between the discharge of a valid contract and the ways in which invalid contracts come to and end. This article assumes that a commercial contract has been properly formed and one of the parties wishes to terminate the contractual relationship.

Bring a Contract to an End

There are four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

1. Discharge by performance

Discharge by performance is where both parties to a contract have performed all their primary obligations under the contract, including all express and implied terms. There are three elements required to be satisfied to say, at law, that performance is complete.

Each of the parties is required to perform their obligations under the contract with perfect precision. Any deviation from the contractual obligations will amount to a breach of contract. In the case of Bolton v Mahadeva (1972), it was held that a contractor could not claim payment for a central heating system which did not work properly as it did not fulfil the primary obligation of heating the house. On the other hand, sometimes performance is not strict and the obligation is not to achieve a specific result, but merely to exercise reasonable care and skill.

Where a contract requires strict performance there are circumstances in which the law will allow payment for part performance of a contract or incomplete contracts on a quantum meruit basis which enables the party performing to get paid fair and reasonable remuneration for their work where:

(i) the contractual obligations are divisible, payment can be recovered for the obligations completed.

(ii) partial performance has been accepted by the other party.

(iii) the other party prevents complete performance by a party ready willing and able to perform.

(iv) a substantial part of the contract has been completed.

Tender of performance takes place when a party attempts to perform their primary obligations under the contract and is prevented from doing so by the other party. It is this that discharges the parties’ obligations. Where a party tenders performance which is refused by the other party, they may sue for breach of contract. Where a party tenders payment, the obligation to tender payment is discharged, but the debt itself is not, so even if payment is rejected, the party is still obliged to pay.

2. Discharge by agreement

A contract may be discharged by agreement in various situations:

Where both parties consent, the mutual obligations to perform contractual obligations will come to an end. Where a contract is discharged in this way, as with any contract, the agreement must be supported by consideration be legally binding. Where both parties have performance obligations outstanding under a contract, an agreement between the parties to discharge those obligations will be enough to satisfy the requirement for consideration, making it legally binding.

However, where one party still has performance obligations under the contract, for the agreement to be legally binding there must be either:

(i) A deed releasing the other party from their obligations; or

(ii) A separate agreement supported by new consideration (‘accord and satisfaction’); or

(iii) The Doctrine of Promisory Estoppel must apply, that is to say where a promise is made, intended to be binding and acted upon, the court will uphold the promise.

It is always open to parties to agree to variations of a their contractuals arrangements. This is put in place by executing a new agreement which supplements the first (rather than entirely replacing it). In some circumstances, the original contract may be discharged in its entirety and replaced with a completely new contract. In either of these circumstances though, the existence of a separate agreement must be proved. Accordingly, it should be in writing.

A contract may be discharged by a condition subsequent which is a stipulation of a state of affairs which causes existing contractual obligations to come to an end. The state of affairs does not necessarily have to be out of the control of the parties.

3. Discharge by breach

When a breach of contract takes place, it does not automatically discharge a contract. If the breach amounts to a breach of a condition of the contract, the innocent party has the option of either accepting the breach, terminating the contract (which has the effect of discharging the parties from any further obligations under the contract) and suing for damages; alternately simply sue for damages caused by the loss caused by the breach, this allowing the contract to continue in force. Where the failure to perform amounts to a breach of warranty, the innocent party is not entitled to terminate the contract, but simply sue for damages.

There are situations in which the innocent party wrongly treats the contract as repudiated by the party in breach, and purports to terminate the contract. This is repudiation of the contract by the innocent party for non-repudiatory breach and is a breach of contract in its own right, entitling the other party to treat the contract as discharged. This was demonstrated in the case of Federal Commerce and Navigation v Molena Alpha (1979) where the owners of a ship wrongly believed they were entitled to repudiate the contract. The court held that the repudiation was wrongful and therefore the other party could treat the contract as discharged.

Where a contract is treated as discharged, the performance obligations under that contract are discharged at the date of termination. However, performance of secondary obligations, namely the obligation to pay damages for any losses caused to the innocent party, are not discharged and continue in force.

Anticipatory Breach

An anticipatory breach of contract may be either explicit or implicit. Such takes place where one party expresses an intention by either not performing their obligations under the contract or performing them in a way in which is inconsistent with the original contractual terms. In these circumstances there are a number of options available to the innocent party. They may sue for damages as soon as the anticipatory repudiation occurs, there do not need to wait for the date of performance.

The innocent party also has the option of either accepting the repudiation by the other party, thereby terminating the contract, or affirming the contract by performing their obligations under it. In the case of White and Carter Limited v McGregor (1962), the defendants cancelled the contract, but the claimants refused to accept the termination and continued with performance under the contract, later suing the defendants for the full contract price. It was held that the claimants were entitled to do this.

The option of accepting the repudiation or terminating the contract is not available where the innocent party requires the cooperation of the other party to perform the contract or if they have no real interest at all in performance of the contract.

4. Discharge by frustration

Discharge by frustration occurs where it is impossible to perform the obligations under a contract due to a subsequent change in circumstances. It is the nature of the obligations which must have changed.

The modern test for frustration is outlined in the case of National Carriers v Panalpina (1981). Frustration occurs when ” .. there supervenes an event (without default of either party and for which the contract makes no sufficient provision) which so significantly changes the nature (not merely the expense or onerousness) of the outstanding contractual rights and / or obligations from what the parties could reasonably have contemplated at the time of its execution that it would be unjust to hold them to the literal sense of its stipulation in the new circumstances.”

Frustration may occur in a number of situations:

Where the subject matter of the contract has been destroyed, or it is unavailable and was intended by both parties to be the subject matter. In the case of Taylor v Caldwell(1863), a contract to hire a music hall was frustrated when the hall was destroyed by a fire.
Where a party to the contract, who is considered important, dies or is incapacitated somehow.
Where the contract has become illegal to perform due to a change in the law or the out break of war.
The commercial purpose of the contract has failed, which includes failure of an event which the contract was based upon, and where there has been government interference or delay.

The Doctrine of Frustration will not apply when:

a. simply because an inconvenience has been caused, there has been an increase in expense or loss of profit. In Davis Contractors Limited v Fareham UDC (1956), it was agreed that a council estate would be built at a fixed price, but due to bad whether, strikes and shortages there were delays and the estate was built at a loss. However, it was held that the contract was not frustrated.

b. the contract contains an express provision (force majeure clause), dealing with such eventualities.

c. frustration is self-induced and one of the parties had a choice regarding performance.

d. the event was reasonably foreseeable by either party as at the date of the agreement.

Conclusions

We have set out the fundamental ways and means by which a contract may be brought to an end. Professionally drawn contracts may contain other means by which the contract may be brought to an end without suffering loss, such removing any rights to damages or recovery for loss, providing for termination for convenience of a party, warranties that presuppose a state of affairs as at the time of the contract that has not eventuated. Moreover, damages claims may be limited to specified sums or avoided in their entirety provided the innocent party does not fulfill their duty to mitigate their loss in the circumstances.

Question by judy w: Who has the contracts where everyone agreed Florida and Michigan would not count?
I would like to know who actually has the contracts that were signed. Why are these contracts not made public? Exactly what is on them? There are lots of unanswered questions about these contracts.

Best answer:

Answer by G-gal
There is no contract, it’s up to the Democrat party how they choose a nominee, the states went against the Democrat party rules, after having been warned. As a resident of Michigan are legislature and Governor knew what they where doing and just didn’t care.

Add your own answer in the comments!

NHL offer a reasonable start in CBA negotiations
By tabling demands that would reduce the players' take to 46 percent of revenues, place term limits on contracts, abolish signing bonuses, extend entry level contracts from three to five years and unrestricted free agency from seven years experience to …
Read more on Yahoo! Sports

[wpramazon asin=”0199699380″]

A few contracts products I can recommend:

Detroit union reps blast proposed contract terms
Dozens of union workers and residents packed a Detroit City Council hearing today to protest a plan to restructure city employees' union contracts. Detroit's Financial Advisory Board approved the plan with a total of $ 102 million worth of savings last …
Read more on The Detroit News

Santa Barbara, CA 93117 (PRWEB) July 16, 2012

Today you still hear about software bugs that have huge negative consequences such as the one that kept Nasdaq at a standstill during the Facebook IPO or the flaw in a routine upgrade that knocked the Bank of Scotlands entire system off-kilter on June 25th. All this should not happen and it is not a fatality. The use of good methodology and tools can protect developers and the companies that employ them from these malicious threats. Providing tools that allow their customers to produce bug-free applications has been the purpose of Eiffel Software from day one. The company has a track record of satisfied customers in the areas of finance, health, defense .They built their applications with EiffelStudio and these applications have been running flawlessly 24×7, 365 days a year for years. EiffelStudio 7.1 continues in this direction.

Making sure that with EiffelStudio developers have all the tools and features they need to produce bug-free applications has been the companys goal for over a quarter of a century, says Emmanuel Stapf, Head of Engineering. Our customers have praised us for this advantage and we are pleased to see that the market is evolving in that direction. With EiffelStudio 7.1 and the improvements we have made, our customers can produce bug free applications and they can produce them quickly. There is no performance penalty for producing quality software.

We are proud to provide the software community with a way to produce bug-free applications easily and efficiently and to never have had a customer making the headline of the press for an Eiffel related bug in their software since the company started in 1985, says Greg Soulages, Director of Sales for Eiffel Software.

The newest version of EiffelStudio is available for download.

EiffelStudio is based on the Eiffel programming language, the most extensive implementation of O-O concepts, standardized through ECMA and the International Standards Organization. Its core concepts, native only to Eiffel, such as Design by Contract, multiple inheritance, genericity, conversions, agents, void safety allow developers to write high quality applications that are easy to maintain. EiffelStudio, which received the prestigious ACM Software Systems Award, is used by developers and design-team leaders in challenging enterprise environments in the financial, insurance, manufacturing, health, and government sectors.

About Eiffel Software

Eiffel software, http://www.eiffel.com, was founded in 1985 with the mission of developing compilers and tools based on the power of pure O-O concepts to improve programmers’ productivity, lifecycle efficiency and quality of the resulting applications. For over twenty-five years Eiffel Software has produced the most cost-effective and advanced development tools on a large variety of platforms. For more information, contact us or call +1-805-685-1006.

Product or company names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective owners.

Find More Contracts Press Releases